CASE CONFERENCE RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT

Temple Grandin

Please reflect on the following questions from the movie below:

1. Describe briefly, in list form, some of the “abnormal” behaviors that Temple Grandin displays throughout the movie. What makes them “abnormal?” How did different people in her life respond to these behaviors?

Some of the “abnormal” behaviors are the way she thought about things. While everyone saw an object, she would interpret the object completely differently. Also, she was not affectionate and did not touch. She only liked to be touched by other surfaces, like the “squeeze machine” she made. Her mother responded very well raising her because she was a bright lady. Other people, saw her as weird. Her mother saw her as “different.”

2. In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association revised the diagnostic criteria in the DSM-V for autism to include a much broader spectrum of symptoms.  It now ranges from brilliant scientists, artists, and musicians to an individual who cannot dress himself or herself.

“One of the problems today is for a kid to get any special services in school, they have to have a label.  The problem with autism is you’ve got a spectrum that ranges from Einstein to someone with no language and intellectual disability,” says Grandin.  “Steve Jobs was probably mildly on the autistic spectrum.  Basically, you’ve probably known people who were geeky and socially awkward but very smart.  When does geeks and nerds became autism? That’s a gray area.”

http://www.templegrandin.com/

What do you think some of the pros and cons of diagnosing a person with autism might be? What are the benefits, and potential harms, of such a label?

A pro is that people with autism have a different way of thinking. This could either make them behind, or ahead the way it made Temple. Having a “disadvantage” is something that could be used as an excuse for most people, but Temple used it as a blessing to succeed.

3. To what extent do you think a label of autism changed the expectations that others had for Temple Grandin as she was growing up, if at all? How did the expectations that others had for her influence her life and her career?

I think the label helped people understand why Temple was different, but at the same time socially it did not help her because people did not understand her, and she did not understand how to make connections with others.

4. Who were the people that formed the best relationships with Temple Grandin? What made their relationships with Temple so successful?

Her roommate and her mother had the best relationships with her. Her blind roommate helped her succeed because she too understood what it was like to have a “disadvantage” and they got along very well. Her mother, a highly educated women, helped her push through and socially help her as well.

5.  Autism is one of many psychiatric disorders that is discussed in our textbook within the Abnormal Psychology unit. However, this article from Psychology Today states: “many autism advocates have worked hard to frame autism as a developmental or neurological disorder rather than a psychiatric one… [but] it is a difficult debate to resolve because there really is no scientific basis on which to separate a psychiatric disorder from a neurological or developmental one.”  Please first read the article, and then write down three big take-aways, questions, or critiques that you have about this debate.

  1. Scientists are having a hard time locating the source of autism.
  2. Autism Speaks currently seems to be trying to avoid this quagmire by now calling autism “a group of complex disorders of brain development.”  Such a description is true enough, but the statement seems just as valid for a variety of other diagnoses such as ADHD or even Bipolar Disorder. “
  3. Labels are something that should not be put on people especially with a “disadvantage.”

 

STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. What were the independent and dependent variables in this experiment?
  • Independent -The set up of the jail – were they assigned guard or prisoner
  • Dependent –  The reaction of the prisoners and the guards
  1. Who participated in this experiment?
  • College male students
  1. How did Philip Zimbardo ensure that there were no pre-existing differences between the guards and the prisoners?
  • He let them chose whether or not they wanted to be guard or prisoner.

4. Since 1953, the American Psychological Association has had a “Code of Ethics” for its members, providing psychologists with a set of guidelines on how to practice psychology in an ethical manner. This includes conducting research. Do you think Milgram violated this requirement? Explain why or why not.

a.      Psychologists must inform research participants of their right to decline to participate and to withdraw from the research once participation has begun.

He did not violate this requirement because he let the prisoner go home when he could not take it any longer.

b.     Psychologists must inform research participants about the factors that might affect their willingness to participate such as potential risks, discomfort, or adverse effects.

He did violate this requirement because he did not warm them of the psychological damage that this experiment caused.

c.      Psychologists do not use deception unless they have determined that the scientific knowledge or educational value makes up for the use of deceptive techniques and that the study would not be effective without deception.

He did not violate this because he did not use deception.

d.     Psychologists do not deceive potential participants about research that is reasonably expected to cause physical pain or severe emotional distress.

He did violate this because the prisoners eventually suffered physical pain.

Discuss and take notes on how the following terms can be applied to the Stanford Prisoner’s experiment

  • Obedience – The prisoners obeyed the guards and the guards obeyed the experimenters. They were following other group members.
  • Conformity-  As one guard started to get stricter the other guards would follow.
  • Group polarization- The connection between the prisoners and the connection between the guards.
  • Peer modeling (observational learning)-  The groups all started to defend each other and also creating a hatred between the two groups.
  • Moral disengagement – How both roles started to actually feel like they were either a prisoner or a guard. The roles applied to them.
  • Environmental determinism – The environment of the prison made the people change.
  • Power differentials-  The group that was powerless really believed that they had nothing, while the people that had the power had almost too much power.
  • In-group and out-group biases- These people were not affiliated in any way before this, and now they knew it was powerful or powerless group.
  • De-individuation/de-humanization- Both of the groups stopped making this a role, but instead started making it into who they were.

Personal Reflection

Think about a time where you were influenced to do something that you did not want to do because someone in authority told you to do it, and so you obeyed (OR a time that you disobeyed). Who was the person in authority? How did you make your decision to behave the way that you did? How did you feel afterwards?

Alternatively, explain a time that you conformed (or did not conform!) to a group. How did you feel about (not) conforming to the group? Are you glad that you did, or do you wish that you didn’t? What went into your decision to (not) conform?

Unpacking The Invisible Knapsack TSC

TRIANGLE: What are three big take aways that you can extract from McIntosh’s essay?

  • My skin should not determine my position in a company or my financial status.
  • “I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege, as males are taught not to recognize male privilege.”
  • The article described men to women privilege first and how the ideas are mirrored to white privilege.

SQUARE: What is one thing that you learned from this reading that resonates with you?

I learned that in her opinion, being white is a “protection,” and other racial groups feel unconfident and uncomfortable. She wrote, “There was one main piece of cultural turf; it was my own turf, and I was among those who could control the turf.” I think that we are not the only racial group that can control it though, and being white like she said is not always a “privilege.”

CIRCLE: What is one idea from this reading that you are still confused about, or thinking about, or that you would like to challenge?

An idea that I started to think about after reading the article is the fact that there were a lot of “I’m pretty sure I can do this” instead of “I know I can do this.” It made me realize that we are still living in a world where people feel uncomfortable. I think America has spent hundreds of years trying to make everyone safe and free and it sickens me to know that people are still not confident enough. Understanding that it’s difficult to stand up for someone else beliefs, it is still not right.

 

Design Thinking: Motivation

Screen Shot 2017-04-07 at 9.20.39 AM.png

“Students are bored and not motivated at this time of the year. With the beautiful weather and under 50 days left for seniors, it is hard to stay focused. We want to see the kids more passionate in the spring term.”

Proposal: To solve the situation of bored and unmotivated teenagers, our group came up with multiple options. We think that in order to make students motivated, there needs to be compromises. More trust and independence needs to be given to the seniors. Senior privileges should expand to relaxed study hall for boarders, or weekly class bonding activities. That being said, the class choices should be wider for the underclassman. Personally speaking as a senior, I feel like there were so many interesting classes to take except I could not fit them all into my schedule this year. To make students more passionate, homework should be optional in classes. Teenagers need to learn to be motivated by themselves. If one has a certain grade in a standard class, like an A, then the homework should be optional. If a student is struggling then they should have to do it. With the intense schedule our day holds, students should be able to have a break.

Inside Out: Psychology Critique

  1. Inside out offers a different perspective on personality than the theories that we discussed in class (Trait, Humanist, Psychoanalytic, Social-Cognitive, & Biological). What aspects of each of those theories are present in Inside Out’s portrayal of personality? What are missing? In what ways does the movie understand personality completely differently?

The Social Cognitive Perspective is used fluently in this movie. As defined below, it is a personality that suggests that your environment influences your behavior, but also the way you think and feel about a situation. This was used when Riley was moving. She felt her life was put together in Minnesota and then once she moved, her personality changed and she felt her life going in a different direction, making her angry or sad. The Trait perspective was also used during the movie, because in her old town Riley was stable and enduring. Once the move happened, and Joy became lost in her head Riley was constantly overcome with all of the other emotions making her confused.

  1. The movie suggests that without her core memories, Riley can no longer be “Riley.” Do you agree with this theory? Would you still be you without any of your memories? To what extent do your memories create who you are today?

I think core memories are part of what makes a person who they are. If Riley never had the early childhood memories playing hockey, or spending time with her family she would have never found the drive behind all of her passions. I know for me; I would have never found my love for singing if it was not for my core memories.

  1. Initially, Riley can seemingly only feel one emotion at a time. By the end of the movie, however, she is able to feel multiple emotions at the same time. How do you make sense of this new ability? Is that consistent with research on emotions?

I think this all had to do with Riley’s maturity level. In her younger ages, her brain was not developed enough to have multiple emotions on the same time. If she was upset, she would be crying. Now, with her brain developing and major changes happening in Riley’s life she is now confused with what emotions can make her feel. It is possible to feel “bitter sweet” and I think that is part of the reason why Riley felt a little overwhelmed because she did not know that she could feel all of these feelings at once.

  1. The movie seems to value happiness over the other emotions, but ultimately the movie suggests that expressing sadness is a tool for eliciting empathy and receiving compassion from those around you. How might sadness actually bring people together?

In the younger stages of your life, emotions pop in and out of your head. Going through so many changes at the age of twelve will bring so many other emotions intertwined. The end of the movie really touched me. A memory will bring out so many different emotions, not just one. When Joy and Sadness both touched a memory, it was remembered that a memory is how you feel, and how other people feel around you. When the hockey memory came into play, sadness thought it was a sad memory, because Riley felt sad she missed the winning shot, but at the same time Joy thought it was a positive memory because the whole team picked her up. Receiving compassion from those around you, and feeling what other people are feeling helps someone mature.

  1. One of Riley’s personality islands is “hockey.” How is “hockey” as an identifier similar to or different from extroversion as a personality trait?

Personality is what people are made up with on the inside. Although emotions are part of what a personality is made of, I believe if you are passionate about something it is part of your personality as well. For Riley, it is similar to a personality trait because of her drive toward hockey. It is not just a sport, it is part of her personality.

 

My Personality Islands

 

Family Island 

Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 9.46.12 PM.png

This island is a very dysfunctional, but my most core island. I imagine this island as something that will never fade away, like some of the islands do in the movie. This island will always be lit up the most, because I know that if we fight or somebody messes up my family is part of who I am. One solid memory I will always have is whenever I am on stage performing, no matter how boring the function may be my family always has a row full of seats in the first few rows cheering me on, making sure their schedule is clear. Another memory I have is my first real fight with my most core person in my family, my mother. I remember it being really awful, and leaving in tears, but coming home the next day to my mom with open arms. That type of love is something I will never find in a friend, or a significant other. The love between my mother and child s a bond that I will forever cherish and love very much.

Performing Arts Island

Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 12.56.19 PM.png

This island has been a significant place in my heart for as long as I remember. From singing “Bye Bye Bye” on top of my kitchen table at the age of two, to being heavily involved in the performing arts at school, and dedicating my summers to theater being on stage is a passion of mine that molds me as a person. Singing has helped me gain a great deal of confidence in every aspect of my life, including being successful in school and public speaking. I assume that this island may not shine as bright as it used to in high school the next four years of my life, but I always want to be able to have this talent and use this talent for the rest of my life.

Trust Island

Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 1.07.11 PM.png

Trust Island is one the islands that I have always taken pride in. A known trait about my personality is that I am a very trusting in other people. I tend to see the good in everyone, no matter what their ways, which I always thought was a blessing until high school. This island has dimmed down, because throughout these last four years I have come to the conclusion that I need to think before I put trust into someone, and be careful with what I say to whom. Although I may think I have great trust in someone, it is not always how it seems. This at first frightened me, because I did not have the maturity to realize not all people are good. Trust is something that is essential to me, but it is not as much of a welcoming island anymore. I have learned that there needs to be an invitation to this more elite island. I have a photo of my grandmother because she is one of the people I trust the most. Throughout my life, my Mimi has been nothing but loyal, loving and totally supportive of everything I do. She has taught me the true meaning of trust, and what it means to be a good person. This island would not be the same without her as the center point.

Friendship Island

Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 8.48.51 PM.png

Friendship island is an island that has been with me ever since my preschool friend. I always knew companionship would be a strong suit of mine, and finding friends that had similar interests in me and that I could be myself around would be easy. In middle school, I found my best friend. We had very similar qualities and interests which made life easy and still today she is my best friend. That being said, leaving her behind to find friends in high school was a completely different experience. I remember finding my group of friends and wondering how I ever ended up with complete opposites, but somehow our friendship is still growing strong after four years. This island is forever changing and has the happiest memories. It coincides with “Trust Island” and every person who has entered a memory on this island will forever be in my heart.

Traveling Island

Screen Shot 2017-04-02 at 9.00.34 PM.png

Traveling has been a passion of mine for a long time. My mom knew from the age of 12, when I wanted my room to be “Paris themed” and dreamt of being anywhere but home that it was essential to start thinking about traveling abroad. While I took many trips for educational enjoyment, like the past few March trips, the last two trips I took really turned my whole island around. First, the service trip to Ghana taught me a lot of different wonderful things and brought a whole new meaning to the word travel. It made me realize a lot about myself, and was eye opening. From that moment on, I realized that I wanted to be a teacher. My most recent trip I traveled to Western Australia to visit my uncle, who’s photo is above. I went into the trip beginning to think it was going to be like every other one, discovering new culture, learning a lot of different things and experiencing the world in a whole different way. Although I did all of those things, it made me value family even more and taught me the importance of staying in touch. This trip was very sentimental to me, and forever changed my values of this Island, along with the Ghana trip. I’ve learned traveling is a lot more than “experiencing new culture” and with each trip comes multiple lessons.

TSC States of Consciousness

Triangle 

  1. The concept of dual processing – processing information on both conscious and unconscious levels of our mind is very interesting to me because multitasking is so unconscious but there is so much that goes on.
  2. The concept of inattentional blindness and changed blindness. It is interesting that you can look at something, and not even notice what you are looking for. As a person, we don’t notice changes if we are focused somewhere else.
  3. In every sense, our body uses selective attention which is very interesting because it is completely unconscious.

Square 

After many researching about selective attention, that is definitely a concept that I square with. Like  I previously said, it is amazing that we are focusing in on something, but at the same time there is something that is moving or moving that we can see, but chose not to notice it.

Circle

A question that I still have, but have solved since then was the “Mind-Body Dualism.” We think that mind and body are working together, and in a lot of ways they do, but I was confused as to how they are separate. It got me thinking, and it makes me realize that sometimes people say “my heart tells me this but my head tells me this.” This makes me realize that your mind and body do in fact feel two different ways and it is how you handle the situation.

 

Freudian Defense Mechanisms

My Personality Profile

Homework 2/21

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is a very common personality assessment based off of the ideas of Carl Jung (Remember this guy with The Red Book?).  This assignment asks you to find out a little bit more about this test, take an online personality test based off of the Myers-Briggs, and evaluate how accurately this test assesses your personality.

First go to http://www.myersbriggs.org/

On the left hand side, please click on “My Personality Type.” Next, click on “MBTI Basics” and answer the following questions:

1. In your own words, describe the essence of Jung’s theory (based on info from the website).

Jung’s theory based on the website seems like perception involves everything you do and everything that you see. Everybody sees things in different ways.

2. The Myers-Briggs is interested in assessing four essential ways we interact with the world (which then translates into what we perceive as our personality); what are these axes?

Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world?

Information: Do you prefer to focus on the basic information you take in or do you prefer to interpret and add meaning?

Decisions: When making decisions, do you prefer to first look at logic and consistency or first look at the people and special circumstances?

Structure: In dealing with the outside world, do you prefer to get things decided or do you prefer to stay open to new information and options?

 

3. Looking at the table below, what do you predict your personality type to be?

ESFP

myersbriggstypes

Next, please go to: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp and take the test. You need to answer every question.  Pick the best answer, as obviously there are going to be times when “sometimes” is the ideal choice. You have to answer “yes” or “no.”

4.  What is your personality type, as confirmed by the test?

ESTP

Finally please go to http://www.personalitypage.com/portraits.html

  1. Chose your personality type
  2. OPTIONAL: Copy the content of the page into a Word document.
  3. Read (OPTIONAL, if it is easier for you: and underline/highlight) the passages that you think are good descriptions of your personality.

I got “The Doer” and it was SO accurate!

Please see this link: the-doer

Please answer the following questions

5. Do you feel that your personality type is an accurate description of your personality?  What parts jump out at you as being particularly accurate?  Inaccurate?

I think the description of my personality was very accurate! Some of the most accurate things is that I am blunt, I live in the here and now, I look at facts of a situation quickly, and I pick up on personality cues. The thing that I did not agree with was the fact that I think school is boring. I think that sometimes I do not see the importance in something, and I am not the smartest student when it comes to school smartness, but I do work hard and I think that is where it became a little inaccurate.

Lastly, take this personality test as well: The Big 5 Personality Test: http://personality-testing.info/tests/BIG5.php

6. Look at the table below to interpret your scores. Do you find this test to be more or less accurate? Why?

The other test was more accurate for me and I liked it better because it seemed easier to understand.